| Sammelband: | Reportationes |
| Incipit: | ------ |
| Manuskript: | ------ |
| Autorschaft: | ------ |
| Verfügbarkeit: | ediert |
| Entstehungszeit: | nach 1308 |
| Daten zur Entstehung: |
"nach heute gängiger Meinung die 'Additiones Magnae' erst nach Scotus´ Tod entstanden" [Rodler (2005), 62*]; Wolter, 1996: 1312/25. Dumont behauptet dagegen die Mitarbeit des Duns Scotus zumindest an den Prolog-Quaestiones und den ersten distinctiones des ersten Buches [Dumont (2018), ###] |
| Einzelbemerkungen: |
Mss.:
zwei Fragmente des Prologs finden sich in [Rodler (2005), 38sq.]:
Ed.:
Autorschaft: Guillelmus de Alnwick (langezeit nur von Balic bestritten); nach allgemeiner Auffassung geben diese die Lehre des Scotus "im wesentlichen getreu wieder" [Rodler (2005), 34*]. "Die Einschätzung von Buch 1 der 'Additiones' als Abbreviatio der 'Reportatio IA ist aufs Ganze gesehen unbestritten richtig, trifft aber auf den Prolog aber nur mit Einschränkungen zu." [Rodler 82005), 90]. "Der publizistische Erfolg von Alnwicks 'Additones Magnae' - die weit verbreitetn 'Additiones' galten als zuverlässiger Scotus-Text und wurden in teils kostspieligen Pergamentbänden vervielfältigt - scheint mir zumindest dafür zu sprechen, daß eine Reportatio examinata' des Scotus zu jener Zeit nicht allgemein bekannt war." [Rodler (2005), 122*]. "the so-called 'Additiones magnae' or the edited version of this 'examined report' [scil. Reportatio I A] made by his secretary William of Alnwick which, as Pelzer had shown, was used by Wadding for the Paris Reportata on the first book" [Wolter (1993), 26; vgl. Pelzer (1923)]. Es gibt auch 'Additiones' des Wilhelm Alnwick zum II. Buch. # Sent. I [ed. L. Wadding II (fälschlich als 'Reportatio' I)] # Sent. II (noch nicht ediert) "The 'Additiones magnae' on Books I and 2 of the 'Sentences' were compiled by William of Alnwick, Scotus's companion and secretary, from Scotus's lectures at both Oxford and Paris, but principally from the latter. (In fact, some manuscrits call the 'Additiones' 'Lectura Parisiensis'.) They were more likely produced between 1312 and 1325 [Wolter (1996), 44]. The Vatican editors take a dim view of Alnwick's faithfulness to the mind of Scotus's, at least as regard the 'Additiones' on Book 2, d. 25 [ed. Vaticana, XIX, 39*-40*, Anm. 3], but their opinon is not generally shared, and surely Dumont is correct in saying that the evidence available to us 'gives every indication that the 'Additiones' are faithful to Scotus' [Dumont (2001), 767; see also Balic (1927), 101-103 and Wolter (1996), 44-45]. Three manuscripts of 'Additiones' 2 contain an 'explicit' attributing the 'Additiones' to Scotus and identifaying Alnwick not as their author but as their compiler ['Expliciunt Additiones secundi libri magistri Iohannis Duns extractae per magistrum Gillermum de Alnwick de ordine fratrum minorum de Lectura Parisiensi et Oxoniensi pracedicti magistri Iohannis' = Oxford, Balliol College, MS 208, f. 40f.; Vat. lat. 876, f. 310v, and Berlin, Staatsbibliothek, Lat. Fol. MS 928, f. 35vb, have similar 'explicits']. In the earliest appearances, the 'Additiones' were identified as an appendix to Scotus's 'Ordinatio', but they gradually came to be inserted into the 'Ordinatio' itself to supply material where Scotus had left the 'Ordinatio' incomplete - a process that attests to the belief of Scotus's contemporaries and immediate successors in the authenticity of the 'Additiones'. Furthermore, the 'Additiones' are cited in the early fourteenth century as an authentic work of Scotus, in particular by Adam Wodeham. So although the precise occasion or purpose of Alnwick's compilation is not clear, there is overwhelming evidence that the 'Additiones' represent the teaching of Scotus himselft" [Williams (2003), 11-12]. Williams, Thomas, "Introduction. The Life and Works of John Duns the Scot", in: Th.
|
| Stichwörter: | ------ |
|
Benutzte Literatur zu diesem Werk: |
|