| Incipit: | ------ |
| Manuskript: | ------ |
| Autorschaft: | zweifelhaft |
| Verfügbarkeit: | im Manuskript |
| Entstehungszeit: | ------ |
| Daten zur Entstehung: | ------ |
| Einzelbemerkungen: |
"The third group of writings translated into Latin comprises writings on astronomy and the philosophy of nature. Among these, a tract handed down under the title 'Liber de plantis' can be found in four manuscripts in Graz, Laon, London and Sevilla. It has to be admitted, however, that this tract was passed down either anonymously or under the alleged authorship of 'Moses Aegyptius'. We do not know any equivalent to the Latin text in an Arabic or Hebrew manuscript. Furthermore, in the examined Graz manuscript only one small passage speaks of errors of 'Moses Aegyptius' being rejected. To me, the ascription to Maimonides seems to be rather dubtful. Further research might shed light on this problem" [Hasselhoff (2002), 11]. "Darüberhinaus hat Albert die pseudoepigraphische Schrift 'De plantis' benutzt, die in den lateinischen Handschriften 'Moses Aegyptius' zugeschrieben ist. Er nennt dieses Werk nie mit dem Titel, sondern schreibt Auszüge davon 'Moses Aegyptius', 'Rabbi Moyses Iudaeus' und 'Rabbi Moyses' zu [IV Sent. d. 7, a. 3 (ed. Borgnet, XXIX, 156a); De vegetalibus l. 6, tr. 1, c. 8, § 33 (ed. Meyer/Jessen, Berlin 1867, 354); § 35 (S. 355); c. 28, § 157 (S. 418-419)]" [Rigo (2001), 30]. |
| Stichwörter: | ------ |
|
Benutzte Literatur zu diesem Werk: |
|