| Incipit: | ------ |
| Manuskript: | ------ |
| Autorschaft: | zweifelhaft |
| Verfügbarkeit: | ediert |
| Entstehungszeit: | ------ |
| Daten zur Entstehung: | ------ |
| Einzelbemerkungen: |
Ed.: Op. philos., V, 2006. "At the present moment it is impossible to determine the parts Scotus und those Scotulus had in the preparation of the work" [Balić (1965, 22] "Although some scholars deny the authenticity of the question-commentary on Aristotle's 'De anima', the attributions to Scotus in the manuscript tradition and its explicit citation by Adam Wodeham provide strong evidence in favor of its authenticity. Further discussion of the authenticity and dating of the work should be sought in the forthcoming critical edition" [Williams (2003) 8]. Der Text zeigt bereits eine neue Etappe in der Entwicklung des Skotismus, die neben Duns Scotus auch Antonius Andreas berücksichtigt [Bérubé (1979), 444, cf. 421]. |
| Stichwörter: | Kommentar: Aristoteles, De anima |
|
Benutzte Literatur zu diesem Werk: |
|