|
Einzelbemerkungen: |
Mss.:
Liber I:
- Berlin, Theol. 114, fol. 44-162.
- Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College 281, fol. 1r-104r.
- Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College 324.
- Cambridge, Pembroke College 160.
- Cambridge, Peterhouse College 100.
- Koblenz, Staatsarchiv 228 [neben Snedishams Abbreviatio vielleicht Fragmente des Kommentars?].
- Leipzig, Univ. 1401, fol. 262r-312r.
- Oxford, Balliol College 199.
- Oxford, Exeter College 43.
- Oxford, Magdelen College 16, fol. 97r-109r [I q. 3].
- Oxford, Merton College 117.
- Oxford, Merton College 93.
- Wien, Nationalbibl. 1397.
Liber II:
- Assisi 172, fol. 162r-168v [II q. 1-5].
- Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College 281.
- Cambridge, Pembroke College 160.
- Cambridge, Peterhouse Colllege 69.
- Leipzig, Univ. 1401.
- Neapel, Bibl. Naz. VII C. 9.
- Oxford, Balliol College 200.
- Oxford, Exeter College 43.
- Oxford, Merton College 117.
- Oxford, Merton College 92, fol. 1r-124v.
- Vatikan, Vat. Lat. 4871, fol. 59r-60v [II q. 1].
- Wien, Nationalbibl. 1397.
Liber III:
- Cambridge, Pembroke College 160.
- Leipzig, Univ. 1401.
- Neapel, Bibl. Naz. VII C. 9, fol. 1a-65b.
- Oxford, Balliol College 201, fol. 1-189.
- Oxford, Exeter College 43.
- Oxford, Merton College 92, fol. 126r-198r.
- Oxford, Merton College 117.
- Vatikan, Vat. Ottob. lat. 1126, fol. 93a-139b.
- Canterbury, Peterhouse College 69.
- Brügge 192 (in Wahrheit: Facinus de Ast – Doucet gegen Stegmüller).
Liber IV:
- Cambridge, Pembroke College 160.
- Cambridge, Peterhouse College 69.
- Neapel, VII C. 9, fol. 66a-93b.
- Oxford, Balliol College 201, fol. 189-216.
- Oxford, Exeter College 43.
- Oxford, Merton College 117.
- Oxford, Merton College 92, fol. 200r-236v.
- Vatikan, Vat. Ottob. 1126, fol. 139c-155b [unvollständig].
- Prag. Kap. 428 (C. XV. 1), fol. 259-261 [IV q. 1].
Ed.:
Teileditionen von folgenden Texteinheiten:
- Sent. I prol. q. 2 [ed. Theissing].
- Sent. I prol. q. 4 [ed. Brown].
- Sent. I prol. q. 5 [ed. Theissing].
- Sent. I prol. q. 6 [ed. Theissing].
- Sent. I prol. q. 7 [ed. Theissing].
- Sent. I d. 11 [ed. R.L. Friedman].
- Sent. I d. 38 [ed. Schwamm].
- Sent. I d. 39 [ed. Schwamm].
- Sent. III q. 1 praelim. [ed. Nadalin].
- Sent. III d. 3 q. un. [ed. Hechich].
- Sent. III d. 4 [ed. J.R. Bell].
- Sent. III d. 23. q. un. [ed. Theissing].
- Sent. III d. 33 q. 1 [ed. Graf].
- Sent. III d. 36 q. 1-2 [ed. Lottin].
Gesamtedition wird an der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften vorbereitet; inzwischen erschienen:
Sent. I, d. 1-3, q. 4, ed. K. Rodler, 2020 [VKHUT 28]
Sent. II, d. 1-14, ed. M. Streijger, 2020 [VKHUT 29]
Inhalt:
- Umittelbare Reaktion auf die R. mündlich bekannte skotistische Univozitätsthese.
Quellen:
- überholte Meinung: Von dem Sentenzenkommentar des Guillelmus de Nottingham abhängig.
- Duns Scotus, Ord. I-II
- Duns Scotus, Rep. Par. III-IV
- Duns Scotus, Lect. I
- Duns Scotus, Quaestiones in Metaphysicam Aristotelis
- Thomas v. Aquin, De ver.
- Thomas v. Aquin, Sum. theol. I-II
- Henricus de Gandavo, Quodl. X
- Richardus de Mediavilla, In Sent. I
Rezipienten und Kritiker Cowtons:
- Adam Wodeham.
- Alfredus Gonterus.
- Anonymus Merton 284.
- Gregor von Rimini.
- Iacobus de Ascoli.
- Iohannes Baconthorpe.
- Iohannes Bassolis.
- Iohannes Brammart.
- Iohannes de Reading.
- Michael Aiguani de Bononia.
- Osbertus Anglicus.
- Paulus de Perusia.
- Prosper von Regio.
- Robert de Walsingham.
- Thomas Anglicus.
- Thomas de Rossy.
- Thomas de Sutton, 'Refutatio de Cowton'.
- William Ockham.
- etc.
|
